Thursday 15 May 2008

FEATURE: The Ethics of Displaying the Dead

Commissioned (unpublished due to timing): MANCHESTER CONFIDENTIAL, May 2008
 
The Ethics of Displaying the Dead.

Considering the debates and opinions sprouting out of viewers and Manchester Confidential readers on both Gunthur von Hagens’ Body Worlds 4 and Manchester Museum’s Lindow man exhibition (otherwise known as ‘The Bog Man’s Care Bear’), the turn out at the recent public debate discussing the ethics of displaying the dead was rather disappointing. Taking my seat among my fellow 20ish members of the public and looking about me, I saw no raving Christians waving banners, no Pagans wielding pick axes – Emma where were you? Not much sign of life at all.

The debate itself, which took place at the Science and Industry Museum, spread itself over a rather lengthy two hours. Not that I would have been checking the time had the discussion been fuelled by passionate discussion. As it was however, I think the clock edged its way past nine (it started at seven) only because it seemed to take everyone so God damn long to say anything – either that or they all liked the sound of their own voices a bit too much. Nevertheless, despite the tooing and froing, the tangents and the minimal participation, the debate lead by Manchester Museum did raise some very interesting arguments to a very controversial question: Should we display the dead?

Well of course we should. Human remains are a vital source of information. As Rose Drew rather sentimentally and emotively stated in the debate, the dead offer us ‘unvarnished truth of all the things we think are important in life’. Bodies have been used and displayed throughout history, even now the Vatican is displaying a will be saint, while Lenin lies preserved in a mausoleum in Moscow's Red Square.

However as Piotr Bienkowski, deputy director at the Manchester Museum, argued rather menacingly (though this may have been for arguments sake), the problem with displaying the dead is that in doing so, we treat them as objects, when in fact they should be treated ‘as if they were still people’, with respect and dignity.

Fair point. When staring into the eyes of a plastinated, but still real, human man in Body Worlds 4, gripping a guitar and leaning back in full swing; or a woman, her skin torn away on the rock behind her (apart from her pubic hair if you’d noticed – pornographic anyone?), are you not left feeling rather uncomfortable? Like maybe this is a step too far? I wonder if on the form Mr Hagens supplied these donors he included a ‘Favourite Hobbies’ section; maybe the lady had a penchant for rock climbing? If not, I do hope the guitar man didn’t have a severe hatred for rock music. Does this then mean this, rather sensationalist, entertainment focused way of displaying dead bodies is disrespectful? These people might have given their bodies to the ‘qualification of physicians and the instruction of lay persons’, but that doesn’t mean they wanted Mr Hagens and his rather creepy leather hat depicting them to the masses as a gambler, or as catching their intestines in a goal save.

It doesn’t help either that Body Worlds has been accused of procuring its bodies, mainly from third world counties such as China, illegitimately. Apparently all participating corpses gave informed consent, but different countries have different understandings of what consent means. How is this censored? When coming to Britain, the bodies were regarded as imports because they were from overseas and thus did not need moral authorization. If we do not have proof that these individuals truly gave their dead body for use, should we display them? If the answer is no, does this not then also apply to the Egyptian mummies which fill our country’s museums, whose excavation and transportation to another land is a deep violation of their beliefs and wishes? Which then brings forward the question of how we value different people? Who should stay and who should go and who has the authority to decide – everything starts getting a bit confudling at this point. 

On the other hand however, if consent was indeed given then what’s the problem? If someone wishes to be cremated, or donate their body to medical schools no one makes a fuss. If we are allowed to do as we wish in life, why can’t we in death? Even if this is joining Hagen’s touring show of curiosities, be it in eternal hunt for fame, immortality or what ever else allures people to sign his dotted line.

Of course aside from all this there is the undeniable fact that exhibitions that display human remains, be it a plastinated human, an Egyptian mummy or shrivelled bog man are incredibly educational. Experiencing human decay, death and our internal workings up front cannot be duplicated by models and books. Modern learning theory tells us that interaction provides a greater resonance within learners. It is the stuff which makes children interested in Science and History, what spurs people to become doctors or anthropologists. Body Worlds makes biology interesting.

Not only that, but it makes learning accessible and available. Provides the opportunity to see and understand death and our internal workings up front in a society where death and the reality of our frailty are locked away, only experienced through computer games and glossy films. The displays of the deceased force us to face our mortality.

Overall it seemed the debates main downfall, apart from being far to pernickety, was offering the public a sideline. When it came to the final vote, there was the choice of yes, no and then a sometimes – copout I think yes. Which was opted for by 14 of the audience- get a backbone guys. The other votes went NO: 3 and YES: 8, so luckily for us fascinated and spectacle hunting members of the public I think bog man is here to stay. While finally a last comment to those who take offence to the display of the dead – wouldn’t it be better if you just didn’t go?

Interested? Then head down to the Museum of Science and Industry on Tuesday 20th May for a talk on the ethics of Body Worlds by Dr Death himself, Tony Walter, Professor of Death Studies at the University of Bath. It starts at 7pm and admission is £5 per person or £2.50 with a BODY WORLDS 4 ticket. Cash bar.

Saturday 10 May 2008

COMMENTARY: 'Miners at Work' by Henry Moore (1941-1943)

Published: STUDENT DIRECT, May 2008 

Henry Moore, the son of a mining engineer, was one of the pioneering and most popular artists of the 21st century. Famous for his large figurative sculptures, this week we focus on a less well-known piece: ‘Miners at Work’, which is displayed at the Whitworth Art Gallery. Moore’s dark and oppressive image holds an eerie atmosphere and tension with the viewer. Created while Moore was a commissioned war artist during the Second World War, it portrays the often forgotten labour, which needed to continually take place in order for the fighting to continue and for life at home to be sustained.

The impact of this image is increased by its size, at only approximately 56 by 43cm it is surprisingly small, however this emphasises the pictures feeling of enclosure. The frame closes in around the image, just as one can imagine the heavy damp earth around the bent over figures. The canvas is broken in to three horizontal tunnels, which tear across the page, one above the other. We cannot see where these tunnels begin or end, or how many there are. We are only given a slice or segment of the expansive underground maze of tunnels and workers. Here Moore forces us to realise the extent of unceasing toil present working in the mines. It feels eternal, never ending.

Moore’s figures in ‘Miners at work’ are abstracted. All of the same build and stance, they turn in to one being, repeated over and over again. They all hunch their backs, crouching in the narrow tunnels. They are void of individuality and work relentlessly. Moore makes them seem mechanic while retaining their organic shapes and associations. We are not detached from them, but connected; one man with piercing white eyes, stares directly out of the canvas, looking at you accusingly. It makes you feel uncomfortable. They are shown as strong and beast like, yet they also seem like children – helpless and lost.

The many different materials, Moore has used in this piece, adds to the expressive rendering of the dark tunnels. Layers of pen, charcoal, watercolour and gauche create a deep and solid darkness; the scratched markings create the rough surface of the mines. The miner’s lamps, tiny in comparison to their huge bodies, emit no light. The darkness is unavoidable; it penetrates their skin, minds and thus filters into our own as we stand in the exhibition space.

It is a moving and strong visual message that Henry Moore depicts. It is oppression, claustrophobia and industrial struggle. It is not beautiful. It is uneasy and opinionated. Definitely go and look for yourself.

Thursday 1 May 2008

COMMENTARY: 'Mirror Image x2' by Anne Desmet

Published: MANCHESTER CONFIDENTIAL, 1st May 2008


Focus on Art: "Thalia Allington-Wood’s fortnightly dissection of artworks in Manchester: this week Anne Desmet at the Whitworth"
 
What and where: Mirror Image x2 (archways) at the Whitworth Art Gallery
 

Date: 2008
 

Artist: Anne Desmet

Who’s she?

Said to be ‘one of the most original talents in contemporary artist-printmaking’, Anne Desmet trained at the Ruskin School of Art, Oxford. Working from home in London, she primarily uses wood engraving and linocut relief to create prints and mixed media collages that display skill and eye for detail. Urban Evolution gives us Desmet’s focus on buildings and urban landscapes, themes which have dominated her work since the early 90s and her scholarship in Rome.

 
Mirror image of what? 

 
Manchester’s Victoria Baths. These are a couple of miles from Whitworth Art Gallery and a place the artist has spent years visiting and re-visiting. Mirror Image x2 Archways is one of 29 pieces Desmet has created at the Baths - the largest body of her work on a single building. Victoria Baths, built in 1906, is an exuberant building completed at the peak of Imperial confidence and civic pride. It comes with stained glass widows, coloured tiles and stunning ironwork. Left to rot – until it won money from BBC’s Restoration series in 2003 - Desmet’s work captures a still moment in development, before the restoration of the building began.
 
Mirror Image is printed twice on the front and rear of a translucent paper sheet and has a wonderfully subtle depth. The wash of powder blue creates liquid light over the room, tiles reflecting water. The two images of the archways mean that the print extends past the restraints of the building. Desmet transforms the space into a sensation: the experience of being within the depicted territory.

Elongated corridors, hidden alcoves, narrowing focal points are all emphasised to make the space seem distant and fantastical. Shafts of sunlight suggest unknown spaces beyond. This morphed perspective is present in many of Desmet’s other prints, the perception of looking down a crooked staircase in ‘Seeds of Change’ or up at a towering marble dome in ‘Pantheon tondo’.

Most poignant in Mirror Image x2 Archways is the sense of isolation that is present in such huge vacant spaces. Looking at Desmet’s work, you experience the echoing sounds, silence and devastating emptiness of this dilapidated building, once filled with noisy life.

So what’s it saying?

 
Desmet explores the wonder of human construction and the close relationship buildings hold with aspirations and desires. This is explicitly evident in her Babel Tower series, which draws upon the biblical account of man’s over-weening ambition. Her artwork ‘Tower of Babel (sandstone)’, with its exposed interior and foundations, shows, as Desmet explains, the ‘vulnerable yet aspirational qualities of towers…and the fragility of human dreams’.

The prints aim to create a fascination with transformation, time and how urban landscapes affect our consciousness and experiences. Our identity is formed by where we call home, our surroundings. Surroundings that hold a historic necessity. They will degrade, be left to crumble: they will then regenerate or be replaced. For better or for worse we are within constant metamorphosis. This is what Desmet’s art examines – architectural evolution in relation to our own natural development. In other words, watch out, it isn't going to last forever.

Is there anything else?

 
Oh yes there is. You can feast yourself on Anne Desmet’s heroic printmaking ancestors. In the next room is City Visions which gives you a role call of big-names, Piranesi, Hogarth, Hiroshige, Sickert, Nevinson and so on. The two shows complement each other perfectly. Definitely go along when you get a chance.

Anne Desmet’s exhibition: Anne Desmet – Urban Evolution and City Visions continues at The Whitworth Gallery, Oxford Rd, Manchester, until 3rd August 2008


LINK: http://www.manchesterconfidential.co.uk/Culture/Architecture/Focus-on-Art